Claude Project Tracker

UX review item 15 asks for a parent read-only Home "with Upload button". The read-only summary shipped; the button did not, because POST /api/study-plan/from-score-report is gated require_student. A parent cannot write today. This is a permissions decision, not a UI one: the endpoint writes into user_skill_state, which drives weak-skill detection and question selection for the student. Options: 1. Leave it. Parent summary says "reports are uploaded from <name>'s account". Zero risk, but parents are often the ones holding the PDF, which is the whole reason the review asked. 2. Add a parent-scoped write endpoint gated on the accepted guardianship, same pattern as the existing read endpoints, and record the uploader on score_reports so the provenance is visible to the student. 3. Parent uploads but it lands as a pending report the student confirms — slowest, safest, and consistent with the review-and-correct principle in REQ-23.3. My read: option 2 with uploader provenance. Option 3 adds a state machine for a problem nobody has reported yet.

Adaptive SAT · adaptive-sat · by saravanan@scrumclaw.ai